About Me

Name: Nantatchie_Rat
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

SUPPORT YOUR GUY!

HOW.....does anyone expect their favorite candidate to win ANYTHING if they are too cynical and just plain too LAZY to vote for them? I have heard so much whining and complaining from my fellow conservatives lately about being "left out" and "forgotten" that I must say that they are acting just like liberals.

Case in point: The mainstream media was calling the republican primaries a two man race between McCain and Romney. They were hoping to just forget about Huckaby sweep him out of the picture. BUT........the people of the states he won and finished second place in had something to say. They cast their ballots for him. And that spoke louder and had far more meaning than any poll or some pinhead pundit's opinion.

So, what's the deal here? How are we deciding who to vote for? Are we letting the newsmedia make our decision for us by hyping up who they support while ignoring who they don't? I am a Huckaby man myself, and tomorrow (Feb. 9) I will vote for him. Even though I am sure McCain will get the nomination. If he does I will support him. But, in the mean time, as long as Huckaby is on the ballot and I am able to vote for him, I will.

 

No candidate can win anything if those who support them refuse to cast their ballot for them. This is not like rooting for a sports team, you have to put in whatever effort it takes to go out and vote. And you can't sit back and depend on other's votes to put give them the win.

Our forbearers established a truly wonderful way for us to govern ourselves. But it is entirely dependant on our participation in order to be preserved.

David D. Poston (R) Louisiana
Feb. 8, 2008

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

About the VT Shootings

 

11:09 AM - MY THOUGHTS THE DAY OF THE VT SHOOTINGS
Current mood: Somber
Category: Somber News and Politics

Today will forever be remembered in all of our hearts and minds. This was a sensless act. How could anyone do such a thing? Over the next few weeks this will certainly be analized over, and over. Every facet of it will be talked about over, and over. You can bet that the shooter will be made to look like a "victim" somehow, and he will be given superstar treatment. Publishers are salivating and waiting for the first chance at the book rights to this. And, as usual, the gunbanners will come crawling out of their holes. Instead of talking about what can be done to recognise people who fit the pattern of the shooter, they will rant and rave about how terrible guns are, and how many rounds the shooter's weapon held, and the caliber, the type of bullet. Everything but how the oncampus culture could have adversely affected  him. There will be many things written about the "desperate" need for "tougher" gunlaws, and proposals to ban a litany of different types of firearms and ammunition. But hardly a word spoken about the cultural elements in this. The very ones screaming the loudest for more gunlaws think nothing of entertaining themselves with violent movies and music. We need to take a very hard look at our culture in this country. We are degenerating into nothing more than heathen savages. Every movie made now seems to be more violent than the last. Or else, it has so much sexual content it is borderline pornography. Television is hardly any better. Traditional boxing matches are giving way to "street brawling" matches, with few rules. Popular music these days, especialy heavy Metal, Rap, and Hip-Hop glorifies thes kinds of acts. Our culture is saying it is OK to do this. Am I saying censor music, movies, and video games? No, but I am saying we need to ask ourselves, if it is so terrible for these kinds of acts to be carried out in real life, then why should we entertain ourselves by watching them? Also, how can students come together to change the culture oncampus. I remember when I was in school, there were different "cliques" and a sort of caste system. There were the elite preppy types at the top. then, the popular people who had lots of friends, and at the bottom were the geeks and nerds. There was no asociating with anyone above your social status. Those above you, wouldn't want to lower themselves. If a student doesn't "conform" to the preconceived "ideal" image that is popular, then they are shunned by the others. And often, ridiculed and made fun of. Also, if a student is an introvert, and not popular, then often they will gravitate to the "outcast" types of music and movies, and begin to align themselves with it's negative and destructive message. The two Columbine shooters are textbook examples of this. Bullying is another thing that needs to be addressed, and it too is a factor in driving an at-risk person to do something like this. Would tougher gunlaws have worked? The Virginia Tech campus was a "firearm-free" zone. No one, except campus police, was allowed to have any type of firearm. It is insane to think that someone who has made up their mind to do something like this would have any regard for laws prohibiting firearms on campus. Instead of punishing innocent law-abiding gun owners, and trying to censor the entertainment industry, let's do some soul searching as a nation, and decide weather or not to show more care and concern for our fellow human beings, or continue to degenerate into bloodthirsty savages.
David D. Poston, Pineville, LA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More on Iraq

11:02 AM - MORE ON THE SITUATION IN IRAQ
Current mood: contemplative
Category: News and Politics

  I think the insanity of certain members of congress can be illustrated by the two stories below. On the one hand, we have sesible military people who have been there and dealt personaly with the Iraqi people, and are speaking from first hand experience. On the other hand, we have Democratic leaders who are obsessed with "loosing the war so we can win the election". They are so consumed by their hatred for the Administration, and Republicans, that the seem to have lost touch with reality.

  The propaganda value of their words and actions to the enemy is so great, that I feel it is bordering on treason, if not outright giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid's comments about the war being lost, and there being no point in the troop surge completely undermined all the efforts made to reassure Iraqi security and military people that we were not going to just abandon them. No doubt his remarks had the polar opposite effect on our enemies. But, "We have to loose the war so Democrats can win in '08!"

  The anti-war movement has got to realise that we cannot just pack up and leave and allow Iraq to become another Al-Quieda stronghold like Afghanistan was. If we did just pull out, we would loose every last bit of our credibility around the world. We would no longer have the place in the world we hold now. And....what other country is strong enough and willing to confront the Islamo-faciests who are trying to dominate the world?

  The Iraqi people and govornment have got to get a grip and stop all the sectarian fighting. No number of troops from any nation can do what they have to do for themselves. They could start by rejecting this idiotic hatred towards each other, Americans, and Jews. They also need to remember who got rid of Saddam and his regime. But, they can't stand for these "infedel occupiers" to desecrate their sacred Islamic land.

  The pro-war people must also understand that the American people are growing weary of this war, and that it is not unpatriotic to question and disagree.......IN A RESPONSIBLE WAY.....not like the Democratic members of Congress and presidential candidates are doing. They must also realise that they cannot run the table anymore. A compromise must be reached, and soon to fund the war effort.

DEMOCRATS HOLD GROUND ON IRAQ TALKS

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070504/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq

 

 

 CONGRESS SHOULD EMBRACE THE SURGE

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/01/opinion/01west.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1

0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit - Remove

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When Does An Election Become A Coronation?

When does an election become a coronation?

When does an election become a coronation? After an elected official has been in office for a long time, and has enjoyed widespread and loyal support they begin to have tremendous influence with their constituency. Upon their retirement it is not uncommon for them to endorse someone to take their place. Then, that person will gain the fundraising and campaign apparatus that the outgoing person has established. This gives them an immediate and sometimes decisive advantage over their opponents.

If the incumbent has done a good job and been trustworthy throughout his or her term, then it can be safe to assume that they will only endorse someone who will be faithful to the office they are running for and the people they will serve. If, on the other hand, the incumbent has been up to no good and been plagued by scandals and controversy then they too will pick someone like their self to succeed them.

The voter should never vote for a candidate simply because the incumbent who they voted for endorsed them.  The voter still has to make up his own mind. It is important to remember that the candidate is not a clone of the incumbent. It is also important to remember that money and a large campaign staff and numerous volunteers will not prevent one from doing their own research and deciding for themselves who the best candidate should be.

It is often said that money wins elections. This is not necessarily true. Yes, it does cost a lot to get one’s message and positions on the issues out. But, even those with limited recourses can still reach the voters. But the voters should also do their part to seek out the candidates positions. By doing so, they can negate the effect of big money campaigns
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »